Narrative, desire, ontological security, transgression: fantasy as a factor in international politics

This article makes the case for taking fantasy seriously in IR. It argues for a Lacanian conception of fantasy as a type of desire-infused narrative through which subjects construct their social realities. The fantasy approach brings added value to the burgeoning IR literature on narratives and onto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of international relations and development Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 243 - 268
Main Author Eberle, Jakub
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Palgrave Macmillan UK 01.03.2019
Palgrave Macmillan
Subjects
Area Studies
Closure
Desire
Development Studies
Foreign policy
International Relations
Narratives
Ontology
Political Science and International Relations
Political Science and International Studies
Scholarship
Security
Social reality
Transgression
War
ontological security
desire
fantasy
German foreign policy
Lacan
narrative
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This article makes the case for taking fantasy seriously in IR. It argues for a Lacanian conception of fantasy as a type of desire-infused narrative through which subjects construct their social realities. The fantasy approach brings added value to the burgeoning IR literature on narratives and ontological security and develops it in multiple respects. First, it spells out the crucial, yet thus far rather implicit and unspecified role of desire in the functioning of narratives and in ontological security. Second, by introducing the notions of the ‘object’ of desire and transgression, the fantasy framework allows us to trace the channelling of desire into discourse. This leads us to basic methodological tools that can capture the ways how exactly ontological security is sought through narratives, which have thus far been developed only sporadically. Third, by viewing the subject as always incomplete and ontological security as ultimately unattainable, the fantasy approach provides a critical, explicitly politicised corrective to the existing scholarship. Rather than promoting ontological security as an ideal, it calls for challenging the closure it imposes on our social reality. These arguments are developed theoretically and illustrated with the case of Germany’s opposition to the Iraq war.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1408-6980
1581-1980
DOI:10.1057/s41268-017-0104-2