Hyperimmune Bovine Colostral Anti-CS17 Antibodies Protect Against Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Diarrhea in a Randomized, Doubled-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Human Infection Model

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) commonly cause diarrhea in children living in developing countries and in travelers to those regions. ETEC are characterized by colonization factors (CFs) that mediate intestinal adherence. We assessed if bovine colostral IgG (bIgG) antibodies against a CF, CS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of infectious diseases Vol. 220; no. 3; pp. 505 - 513
Main Authors Savarino, Stephen J., McKenzie, Robin, Tribble, David R., Porter, Chad K., O’Dowd, Aisling, Sincock, Stephanie A., Poole, Steven T., DeNearing, Barbara, Woods, Colleen M., Kim, Hye, Grahek, Shannon L., Brinkley, Carl, Crabb, Joseph H., Bourgeois, A. Louis
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Oxford University Press 02.07.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-1899
1537-6613
1537-6613
DOI10.1093/infdis/jiz135

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) commonly cause diarrhea in children living in developing countries and in travelers to those regions. ETEC are characterized by colonization factors (CFs) that mediate intestinal adherence. We assessed if bovine colostral IgG (bIgG) antibodies against a CF, CS17, or antibodies against CsbD, the minor tip subunit of CS17, would protect subjects against diarrhea following challenge with a CS17-expressing ETEC strain. Adult subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to receive oral bIgG against CS17, CsbD, or placebo. Two days prior to challenge, subjects began dosing 3 times daily with the bIgG products (or placebo). On day 3, subjects ingested 5 × 109 cfu ETEC strain LSN03-016011/A in buffer. Subjects were assessed for diarrhea for 120 hours postchallenge. A total of 36 subjects began oral prophylaxis and 35 were challenged with ETEC. While 50.0% of the placebo recipients had watery diarrhea, none of the subjects receiving anti-CS17 had diarrhea (P = .01). In contrast, diarrhea rates between placebo and anti-CsbD recipients (41.7%) were comparable (P = 1.0). This is the first study to demonstrate anti-CS17 antibodies provide significant protection against ETEC expressing CS17. More research is needed to better understand why anti-CsbD was not comparably efficacious. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00524004.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
1537-6613
DOI:10.1093/infdis/jiz135