A standardized obstacle course for assessment of visual function in ultra low vision and artificial vision

We describe an indoor, portable, standardized course that can be used to evaluate obstacle avoidance in persons who have ultralow vision. Six sighted controls and 36 completely blind but otherwise healthy adult male (n=29) and female (n=13) subjects (age range 19-85 years), were enrolled in one of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of visualized experiments no. 84; p. e51205
Main Authors Nau, Amy Catherine, Pintar, Christine, Fisher, Christopher, Jeong, Jong-Hyeon, Jeong, KwonHo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States MyJove Corporation 11.02.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We describe an indoor, portable, standardized course that can be used to evaluate obstacle avoidance in persons who have ultralow vision. Six sighted controls and 36 completely blind but otherwise healthy adult male (n=29) and female (n=13) subjects (age range 19-85 years), were enrolled in one of three studies involving testing of the BrainPort sensory substitution device. Subjects were asked to navigate the course prior to, and after, BrainPort training. They completed a total of 837 course runs in two different locations. Means and standard deviations were calculated across control types, courses, lights, and visits. We used a linear mixed effects model to compare different categories in the PPWS (percent preferred walking speed) and error percent data to show that the course iterations were properly designed. The course is relatively inexpensive, simple to administer, and has been shown to be a feasible way to test mobility function. Data analysis demonstrates that for the outcome of percent error as well as for percentage preferred walking speed, that each of the three courses is different, and that within each level, each of the three iterations are equal. This allows for randomization of the courses during administration.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Correspondence to: Amy Catherine Nau at nauac@upmc.edu
ISSN:1940-087X
1940-087X
DOI:10.3791/51205