Endovascular strategy or open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: one-year outcomes from the IMPROVE randomized trial

To report the longer term outcomes following either a strategy of endovascular repair first or open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, which are necessary for both patient and clinical decision-making. This pragmatic multicentre (29 UK and 1 Canada) trial randomized 613 patients with a cl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean heart journal Vol. 36; no. 31; pp. 2061 - 2069
Main Authors Grieve, Richard, Sweeting, Michael J, Thompson, Simon G, Gomes, Manuel, Powell, Janet T, Ashleigh, Ray, Greenhalgh, Roger M, Hinchliffe, Robert J, Thompson, Matt M, Ulug, Pinar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 14.08.2015
SeriesEditor's choice
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To report the longer term outcomes following either a strategy of endovascular repair first or open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, which are necessary for both patient and clinical decision-making. This pragmatic multicentre (29 UK and 1 Canada) trial randomized 613 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ruptured aneurysm; 316 to an endovascular first strategy (if aortic morphology is suitable, open repair if not) and 297 to open repair. The principal 1-year outcome was mortality; secondary outcomes were re-interventions, hospital discharge, health-related quality-of-life (QoL) (EQ-5D), costs, Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALYs), and cost-effectiveness [incremental net benefit (INB)]. At 1 year, all-cause mortality was 41.1% for the endovascular strategy group and 45.1% for the open repair group, odds ratio 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62, 1.17], P = 0.325, with similar re-intervention rates in each group. The endovascular strategy group and open repair groups had average total hospital stays of 17 and 26 days, respectively, P < 0.001. Patients surviving rupture had higher average EQ-5D utility scores in the endovascular strategy vs. open repair groups, mean differences 0.087 (95% CI 0.017, 0.158), 0.068 (95% CI -0.004, 0.140) at 3 and 12 months, respectively. There were indications that QALYs were higher and costs lower for the endovascular first strategy, combining to give an INB of £3877 (95% CI £253, £7408) or €4356 (95% CI €284, €8323). An endovascular first strategy for management of ruptured aneurysms does not offer a survival benefit over 1 year but offers patients faster discharge with better QoL and is cost-effective. ISRCTN 48334791.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
See the contributions of IMPROVE trial investigators in the Acknowledgement section.
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv125