The Value of Radiologic Interventions and 18F-DOPA PET in Diagnosing and Localizing Focal Congenital Hyperinsulinism: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

• Published in: Molecular imaging and biology Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 97 - 105
• Main Authors: Blomberg, Björn A., Moghbel, Mateen C., Saboury, Babak, Stanley, Charles A., Alavi, Abass
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer-Verlag 01.02.2013
• Subjects: Imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Radiology; Research Article; F-DOPA PET; Diagnosis; Congenital hyperinsulinism; Positron emission tomography; Arterial stimulation venous sampling; Pancreatic venous sampling
• ISSN: 1536-1632; 1860-2002
• DOI: 10.1007/s11307-012-0572-0

Purpose This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the diagnostic performance of pancreatic venous sampling (PVS), selective pancreatic arterial calcium stimulation with hepatic venous sampling (ASVS), and 18 F-DOPA positron emission tomography (PET) in diagnosing and localizing focal congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI). Procedures This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science electronic databases were systematically searched from their inception to November 1, 2011. Using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, two blinded reviewers selected articles. Critical appraisal ranked the retrieved articles according to relevance and validity by means of the QUADAS-2 criteria. Pooled data of homogeneous study results estimated the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Results 18 F-DOPA PET was superior in distinguishing focal from diffuse CHI (summary DOR, 73.2) compared to PVS (summary DOR, 23.5) and ASVS (summary DOR, 4.3). Furthermore, it localized focal CHI in the pancreas more accurately than PVS and ASVS (pooled accuracy, 0.82 vs . 0.76, and 0.64, respectively). Important limitations comprised the inclusion of studies with small sample sizes, high probability of bias and heterogeneity among their results. Studies with small sample sizes and high probability of bias tended to overestimate the diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions This systematic review and meta-analysis found evidence for the superiority of 18 F-DOPA PET in diagnosing and localizing focal CHI in patients requiring surgery for this disease.