A Comparison of Radiochemical Methods for Cesium-137 Determination
The results are presented of a comparative study seeking an accurate and precise radiochemical method for 137 Cs determination in burnup measurements. The methods taken up are chloroplatinate-precipitation (Method I), tetraphenylborate-precipitation (Method II), tetraphenylborate-extraction (Method...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of nuclear science and technology Vol. 9; no. 4; pp. 241 - 248 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Tokyo
Taylor & Francis Group
01.04.1972
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The results are presented of a comparative study seeking an accurate and precise radiochemical method for
137
Cs determination in burnup measurements. The methods taken up are chloroplatinate-precipitation (Method I), tetraphenylborate-precipitation (Method II), tetraphenylborate-extraction (Method III), potassium hexacyanocobalt(II) ferrate(II)-substitution (Method IV) and ion-exchange (Method V).
A common sample, an aqueous solution obtained from dissolving irradiated uranium fuel and containing approximately 5μCi of
137
Cs, was analyzed by seven analysts using the five methods. A statistical analysis of the results obtained (105 values in all) show that the expected precision, at the 0.05 probability level, of a single determination in non-rehearsed trials of each method are: Method I, ±3.0%; Method II, ±5.6%; Method III, ±5.3% Method IV, ±10.9%; Method V, ±4.2%. The accuracy follows the same pattern except Method III and Method IV. The advantages and disadvantages of the five methods are discussed from the standpoint of utilization in burnup measurements. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3131 1881-1248 |
DOI: | 10.1080/18811248.1972.9734836 |