A Comparison of Radiochemical Methods for Cesium-137 Determination

The results are presented of a comparative study seeking an accurate and precise radiochemical method for 137 Cs determination in burnup measurements. The methods taken up are chloroplatinate-precipitation (Method I), tetraphenylborate-precipitation (Method II), tetraphenylborate-extraction (Method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of nuclear science and technology Vol. 9; no. 4; pp. 241 - 248
Main Authors OKASHITA, Hiroshi, NATSUME, Haruo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Tokyo Taylor & Francis Group 01.04.1972
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The results are presented of a comparative study seeking an accurate and precise radiochemical method for 137 Cs determination in burnup measurements. The methods taken up are chloroplatinate-precipitation (Method I), tetraphenylborate-precipitation (Method II), tetraphenylborate-extraction (Method III), potassium hexacyanocobalt(II) ferrate(II)-substitution (Method IV) and ion-exchange (Method V). A common sample, an aqueous solution obtained from dissolving irradiated uranium fuel and containing approximately 5μCi of 137 Cs, was analyzed by seven analysts using the five methods. A statistical analysis of the results obtained (105 values in all) show that the expected precision, at the 0.05 probability level, of a single determination in non-rehearsed trials of each method are: Method I, ±3.0%; Method II, ±5.6%; Method III, ±5.3% Method IV, ±10.9%; Method V, ±4.2%. The accuracy follows the same pattern except Method III and Method IV. The advantages and disadvantages of the five methods are discussed from the standpoint of utilization in burnup measurements.
ISSN:0022-3131
1881-1248
DOI:10.1080/18811248.1972.9734836