Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Fulgoridae: Aphaeninae) finally, but suddenly arrived in Korea

A history of name changes in two fulgorid species - Lycorma delicatula and Limois emelianovi - is reviewed. Lycorma delicatula was once mistakenly reported to occur in Korea. Now, it has suddenly become common in western Korea, creating the suspicion that it has recently arrived from China and settl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEntomological research Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 281 - 286
Main Authors Han, J.M. (Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea), Kim, H.J. (Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea), Lim, E.J. (Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea), Lee, S.H. (Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea), Kwon, Y.J. (Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea), Cho, S.W. (Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea), E-mail: soowon@chungbuk.ac.kr
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne, Australia Blackwell Publishing Asia 01.12.2008
한국곤충학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1738-2297
1748-5967
1748-5967
DOI10.1111/j.1748-5967.2008.00188.x

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A history of name changes in two fulgorid species - Lycorma delicatula and Limois emelianovi - is reviewed. Lycorma delicatula was once mistakenly reported to occur in Korea. Now, it has suddenly become common in western Korea, creating the suspicion that it has recently arrived from China and settled in Korea. A brief morphological and biological description of L. delicatula is provided, and its original Korean name, "ggot-mae-mi", is revalidated. Limois emelianovi, sometimes considered a synonym of emeljanovi, is the correct name for this species, as emeljanovi is simply another transliteration of the personal name Emelianov, Emeljanov or Emel'yanov. The name emelianovi stands correct based on the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature code 32.5.1, because there is no internal evidence of an inadvertent error, and an incorrect transliteration is not considered an inadvertent error. The cytochrome oxidase I (COI) barcoding regions of both species were sequenced and compared for future reference.
Bibliography:2009000652
H10
istex:0468225B6FF19153EC75BB788A0FBBE3999D1080
ArticleID:ENR188
ark:/67375/WNG-TB0SK6SC-0
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
G704-000624.2008.38.4.008
ISSN:1738-2297
1748-5967
1748-5967
DOI:10.1111/j.1748-5967.2008.00188.x