DEVELOPMENT OF A MODEL SYSTEM TO COMPARE CELL SEPARATION METHODS FOR THE ISOLATION OF FETAL CELLS FROM MATERNAL BLOOD

Three major methods have been described for the isolation of fetal cells from maternal blood: fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS), immunomagnetic beads, and magnetic‐activated cell sorting (MACS). To date, no study has directly compared fetal cell recovery using each of these methods. Here we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPrenatal diagnosis Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. 289 - 298
Main Authors BIANCHI, DIANA W., KLINGER, KATHERINE W., VADNAIS, THERESA J., DEMARIA, MARY ANN, SHUBER, ANTHONY P., SKOLETSKY, JOEL, MIDURA, PAT, DIRISO, MATTHEW, PELLETIER, CHRISTINE, GENOVA, MICHELLE, ERIKSON, MARLENA S., WILLIAMS, JOHN M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.04.1996
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Three major methods have been described for the isolation of fetal cells from maternal blood: fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS), immunomagnetic beads, and magnetic‐activated cell sorting (MACS). To date, no study has directly compared fetal cell recovery using each of these methods. Here we describe our system using a ‘model’ male fetal cell mixed into female peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Fetal cell yields and purities were assayed by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using chromosomes Y‐ and 7‐specific sequences. Fetal cell recovery was investigated by selection of CD71+ cells or depletion of CD45+ cells. Our data demonstrated variation in fetal cell recovery for all methods tested, although CD71+ selection by FACS gave the best and most consistent results.
Bibliography:istex:AD9CC36DFA6DD6D435DD28C7DF47FC0BC62C5713
ark:/67375/WNG-P71KK2T7-V
ArticleID:PD843
ISSN:0197-3851
1097-0223
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199604)16:4<289::AID-PD843>3.0.CO;2-T