Effects of continuous vs. cycling estrogen replacement on the acquisition, retention and expression of place- and response-learning in the open-field tower maze

• Published in: Neurobiology of learning and memory Vol. 114; pp. 81 - 89
• Main Authors: Lipatova, Olga, Byrd, Dennis, Green, John T., Toufexis, Donna J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2014; Elsevier BV
• Subjects: Animal cognition; Animals; Cognition - drug effects; Continuous; Corpus Striatum - drug effects; Cycling; Drug Administration Schedule; Estradiol - administration & dosage; Estrogen; Estrogens; Estrogens - administration & dosage; Female; Gene expression; Hippocampus - drug effects; Learning - drug effects; Maze Learning - drug effects; Memory - drug effects; Ovariectomy; Place-learning; Rats; Response-learning; Rodents; Spatial Memory - drug effects; Place-learning; Cycling; Continuous; Estrogen; Response-learning
• ISSN: 1074-7427; 1095-9564
• DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2014.05.001

•We address controversies in literature regarding estrogen’s effects on cognition.•Cycling- but not continuous-estrogen regiment produces effect on place learning.•Estrogen differentially effects response and place learning.•A novel start position impairs performance on place learning in estrogen treated rats.•A novel start position does not disrupt response learning in estrogen treated rats. Estrogen has been shown to either enhance or impair learning and memory in female rats. The use of different experimental paradigms or estrogen treatment regimens may contribute to these disparate findings. In order to assess the effect of different estradiol (E2) treatments on several aspects of cognition, we trained ovariectomized female rats with either continuous, cycling, or vehicle E2 replacement, in an open-field tower maze task (OFTM) designed to test reference memory in a low-stress environment. In addition, in order to compare two distinct learning and memory systems, rats were trained to use either a dorsolateral striatum-based response type learning or a hippocampal-based place type learning to solve the maze. Results showed that cyclic, but not continuous, E2 replacement facilitated the acquisition of spatial memory in place-learners. Neither E2 regimen affected acquisition in response-learners. Additionally, when all experimental groups were performing at asymptote, rats were evaluated for performance stability by changing the location of their start position in the OFTM. Both regimens of E2 disrupted the expression of spatial memory in place-learners following the novel start position. However, E2 replacement protected ovariectomized female rats from the disruption of memory expression following a start position change in response-learners. Additionally all experimental groups performed equally well when tested following a 21-day period during which rats were absent from the maze. These results suggest that E2 fluctuation is particularly important in the acquisition of hippocampal-mediated spatial learning, and that hippocampal-based memory may be subject to disruption following environmental change, while striatum-based memory is subject to protection.