Association between Tooth Loss and Stroke: A Systematic Review

• Published in: Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases Vol. 29; no. 8; p. 104873
• Main Authors: Fagundes, Nathalia Carolina Fernandes, Couto, Roberta Souza D'Almeida, Brandão, Ana Paula Taborda, Lima, Leidiane Alencar de Oliveira, Bittencourt, Leonardo de Oliveira, Souza-Rodrigues, Renata Duarte de, Freire, Marco Aurelio M., Maia, Lucianne Cople, Lima, Rafael Rodrigues
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc 01.08.2020
• Subjects: Edentulous; Mouth; Stroke; Tooth loss; Stroke; Edentulous; Tooth loss; Mouth
• ISSN: 1052-3057; 1532-8511
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104873

This systematic review aims to evaluate the association between tooth loss and stroke. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The PECO strategy was used to limit the eligibility criteria. The following databases were used on searches: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, LILACS and OpenGrey. We included observational studies performed in adults (Population), in which patients with tooth loss (Exposition) and patients without tooth loss (Comparison) were observed to investigate the association between tooth loss and stroke (Outcome). After searches, the results were submitted to a selection process, followed by data extraction, quality assessment and risk of bias evaluation. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated through GRADE approach. A total of 925 potential studies were retrieved by the searches and 9 were included in this review. Seven of the included articles described an association between tooth loss and stroke. Low risk of bias and a low certainty of the evidence were identified to all studies. The certainty of the evidence may be associated with the observational nature of the included studies. Even though an association between tooth loss and stroke was suggested, the low strength of the current evidence indicated the need for further investigations with a better methodological design to conclude this question.