Unilateral Versus Bilateral Refractive Lens Exchange With a Trifocal Intraocular Lens in Emmetropic Presbyopic Patients

• Published in: American journal of ophthalmology Vol. 223; pp. 53 - 59
• Main Authors: Fernández-García, Javier L., Llovet-Rausell, Andrea, Ortega-Usobiaga, Julio, Bilbao-Calabuig, Rafael, Llovet-Osuna, Fernando, Druchkiv, Vasyl, Arias-Puente, Alfonso
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.03.2021; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Cornea; Emmetropia - physiology; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lens Implantation, Intraocular; Male; Medical records; Middle Aged; Multifocal Intraocular Lenses; Optics; Patient satisfaction; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data; Presbyopia - physiopathology; Presbyopia - surgery; Questionnaires; Reoperation; Retinal detachment; Retrospective Studies; Surgeons; Surgery; Surveys and Questionnaires; Vision, Binocular - physiology; Visual Acuity - physiology
• ISSN: 0002-9394; 1879-1891
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.09.044

To compare visual outcomes and patient satisfaction between unilateral and bilateral trifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in emmetropic patients with presbyopia. Retrospective observational case series. This is a multicenter, multisurgeon study of emmetropic presbyopes who underwent refractive lens exchange (RLE) followed by an implantation of FineVision IOL (PhysIOL). Inclusion criteria were emmetropic eyes, with a sphere between –0.25 and +0.50 diopters (D), cylinder of less than 0.75 D and spherical equivalent (SE) between –0.25 and +0.25 D. In addition, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) had to be Snellen >0.9 in each eye. A total of 171 eyes of 122 patients were evaluated. This sample was divided into 2 groups depending on whether they have been operated monocularly or binocularly. Visual and refractive performance, patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence were evaluated. UDVA and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) remained almost unchanged after monocular and binocular surgery. Binocular uncorrected intermediate (UIVA) and near visual acuity (UNVA) were better in those operated binocularly (0.3±0.12 vs 0.22±0.06, P < .063, and 0.09±0.08 vs 0.04±0.05, P < .027, respectively). Predictability and efficacy were higher in the binocular group, whereas safety was better in the monocular group. Visual dysphotopsia was worse and spectacle independence for all distances was higher in binocular group. Our research shows that RLE with binocular implantation of a trifocal diffractive IOL in presbyopic emmetropic patients is more successful in UNVA than monocular implantation. However, no significant differences were observed in UDVA, UIVA, and patient satisfaction.