Water retention value predicts biomass recalcitrance for pretreated lignocellulosic materials across feedstocks and pretreatment methods

• Published in: Cellulose (London) Vol. 25; no. 6; pp. 3423 - 3434
• Main Authors: Weiss, Noah D., Felby, Claus, Thygesen, Lisbeth G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01.06.2018; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Biomass; Bioorganic Chemistry; Cellulose; Ceramics; Chemistry; Chemistry and Materials Science; Composites; Constraints; Glass; Hydrolysis; Lignocellulose; Morphology; Natural Materials; NMR; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Organic Chemistry; Original Paper; Physical Chemistry; Polymer Sciences; Pretreatment; Raw materials; Retention; Substrates; Sustainable Development; Water constraint; Pretreatment; Biomass recalcitrance; Water retention value; LFNMR; Biomass-water interactions
• ISSN: 0969-0239; 1572-882X
• DOI: 10.1007/s10570-018-1798-z

Understanding the causes of lignocellulosic biomass recalcitrance is necessary for developing robust biomass conversion processes for fuels and chemicals. A key factor in biomass recalcitrance is the physical and chemical relationship between biomass and water. Water is known to be important for enzymatic hydrolysis both because it is a co-substrate for cellulose hydrolysis, but also because it acts as a swelling agent that allows enzymes access to the substrate. It has been shown that the water retention value, and water constraint as measured by spin–spin low field NMR (T 2 LFNMR) techniques, correlated to biomass recalcitrance for similar lignocellulosic materials pretreated at different severities. In this work, water retention and water constraint was measured across species and pretreatment methods and compared to the enzymatic digestibility of the cellulose fraction. There is an overall positive correlation between the water retention value and glucose hydrolysis yields. Average water constraint in the samples (as represented by monocomponent T 2 decay times) could not be correlated to biomass recalcitrance; however a relationship was found between the relative amount of more highly constrained water measured and hydrolysis performance. Feedstock heterogeneity and differences in sample morphology may account for the variation in the sample set. Further research is needed to develop these predictive methods, but can be applied with good accuracy on specific feedstock types or for specific pretreatment methods.