Meta‐analysis to predict the effects of probiotics on meat quality of broiler
The demand for chicken meat has surged globally due to its status as a primary protein source in human diets. However, ensuring high‐quality meat products has become an increasingly important subject to consumers. In this study, 21 articles from PubMed and Web of Science databases published between...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition Vol. 108; no. 6; pp. 1616 - 1623 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Germany
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.11.2024
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The demand for chicken meat has surged globally due to its status as a primary protein source in human diets. However, ensuring high‐quality meat products has become an increasingly important subject to consumers. In this study, 21 articles from PubMed and Web of Science databases published between 2005 and 2023 were examined to assess the influence of probiotic supplementation on broiler meat quality. The meta‐analysis revealed significant findings across various meat quality parameters. Specifically, probiotics were found to significantly affect meat colour parameters, including redness, yellowness, and lightness, in both breast and thigh meat samples. Moreover, significant differences were observed in parameters such as water‐holding capacity (p < 0.001), cook loss (p = 0.047), and shear force (p = 0.025) between control and probiotic groups. However, it's essential to note the considerable heterogeneity among the studies, emphasising the need for a cautious interpretation of the results. Despite this variability, the study underscores the potential of probiotics to positively influence broiler meat quality, highlighting avenues for further research and standardisation in poultry production practices. These findings also contribute to a better understanding of probiotics’ role in improving meat quality and meeting consumer preferences for nutritious and high‐quality poultry products. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0931-2439 1439-0396 1439-0396 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jpn.14006 |