Beyond serum creatinine: which tools to evaluate renal function in cirrhotic patients?

In cirrhotic patients, a high serum creatinine value is an independent mortality factor. Similarly, it is predictive of renal insufficiency after liver transplantation. In these cases, chronic kidney disease is also an independent mortality factor. A relevant evaluation of glomerular filtration rate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHepatology research Vol. 48; no. 10; pp. 771 - 779
Main Authors Carrier, Paul, Debette‐Gratien, Marilyne, Essig, Marie, Loustaud‐Ratti, Véronique
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.09.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In cirrhotic patients, a high serum creatinine value is an independent mortality factor. Similarly, it is predictive of renal insufficiency after liver transplantation. In these cases, chronic kidney disease is also an independent mortality factor. A relevant evaluation of glomerular filtration rate is crucial, particularly in cases of end‐stage liver disease or liver transplantation, and is key for the decision to undertake dual liver–kidney transplantation. Serum creatinine or creatinine‐based equations are the most used tools in clinical practice but they significantly overestimate renal function. Equilibrium inulin renal clearance remains the gold standard but is time consuming and expensive. Cystatin C and cystatin C‐based equations are less influenced by muscle mass or bilirubin value, but their dosage is not standardized and they are expensive. Pharmacological models using exogenous markers, new kidney biomarkers, Doppler coupled with ultrasounds, and kidney histology could be interesting tools but their indications need to be specified.
Bibliography:The authors have no conflict of interest.
Received 7 May 2018; revision 6 June 2018; accepted 23 June 2018
Conflict of interest
.
Financial support
None declared.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1386-6346
1872-034X
DOI:10.1111/hepr.13224