Evaluation and Comparison of a 3,5-Dimethylphenyl Isocyanate Teicoplanin with Phenyl Isocyanate Teicoplanin Chiral Stationary Phase Using RP-HPLC
HPLC enantiomeric separations of 8 a-amino acids were achieved using two self-made chiral stationary phases (CSP)-henyl isocyanate teicoplanin (Phe-TE) and 3,5-dimethylphenyl isocyanate teicoplanin (DMP-TE), using reversed phase mobile phases. The Phe-TE or the DMP-TE CSP was prepared from the TE us...
Saved in:
Published in | Chinese journal of chemistry Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 157 - 162 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Weinheim
WILEY-VCH Verlag
2012
WILEY‐VCH Verlag Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1001-604X 1614-7065 |
DOI | 10.1002/cjoc.201180463 |
Cover
Summary: | HPLC enantiomeric separations of 8 a-amino acids were achieved using two self-made chiral stationary phases (CSP)-henyl isocyanate teicoplanin (Phe-TE) and 3,5-dimethylphenyl isocyanate teicoplanin (DMP-TE), using reversed phase mobile phases. The Phe-TE or the DMP-TE CSP was prepared from the TE using derivative agents, phenyl isocyanate or 3,5-dimethylphenyl isocyanate, respectively. The chromatographic results were given as the retention, selectivity, resolution factor and the enantioselective free energy difference corresponding to the separation of the two enantiomers. The effect of pH, organic modifier type and amount were discussed, and the stereose- lectivities for two TE-based CSPs were compared. The chiral selectivity factor for six a-amino acids on DMP-TE is somewhat bigger than that on Phe-TE CSP under reversed phase (RP) mode. Comparison of the enantiomeric separations using self-made Phe-TE and DMP-TE was conducted to gain a better understanding of the chiral recognition mechanism of the macrocyclic glycopeptide CSP. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | 31-1547/O6 chiral stationary phase, phenylisocyanate teicoplanin, 3,5-dimethylphenylisocyanate teicoplanin HPLC enantiomeric separations of 8 a-amino acids were achieved using two self-made chiral stationary phases (CSP)-henyl isocyanate teicoplanin (Phe-TE) and 3,5-dimethylphenyl isocyanate teicoplanin (DMP-TE), using reversed phase mobile phases. The Phe-TE or the DMP-TE CSP was prepared from the TE using derivative agents, phenyl isocyanate or 3,5-dimethylphenyl isocyanate, respectively. The chromatographic results were given as the retention, selectivity, resolution factor and the enantioselective free energy difference corresponding to the separation of the two enantiomers. The effect of pH, organic modifier type and amount were discussed, and the stereose- lectivities for two TE-based CSPs were compared. The chiral selectivity factor for six a-amino acids on DMP-TE is somewhat bigger than that on Phe-TE CSP under reversed phase (RP) mode. Comparison of the enantiomeric separations using self-made Phe-TE and DMP-TE was conducted to gain a better understanding of the chiral recognition mechanism of the macrocyclic glycopeptide CSP. Shen, Baochuna, Zhang, Datong, Yu, Xiaoyan,Guo, Wei, Han, Yaqiong, Xu, Xiuzhu,(School of Pharmaceutical Science, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan 650500, China b Department of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310027, China) istex:A46A2E62C41EBEAA25D3E117C60A0666B677640B ArticleID:CJOC201180463 ark:/67375/WNG-KK7LKN87-H ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1001-604X 1614-7065 |
DOI: | 10.1002/cjoc.201180463 |