Accounting for Proportion Congruency Effects in the Stroop Task in a Confounded Setup: Retrieval of Stimulus-Response Episodes Explains it All

• Published in: Journal of cognition Vol. 5; no. 1; p. 39
• Main Authors: Rothermund, Klaus, Gollnick, Nathalie, Giesen, Carina G
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Ubiquity Press 29.06.2022
• Subjects: cognitive control; contingency learning; episodic response retrieval; episodic retrieval of control states; law of recency; proportion congruency effect; stimulusresponse bindings; stroop task; episodic response retrieval; law of recency; Stroop task; cognitive control; episodic retrieval of control states; stimulus-response bindings; contingency learning; proportion congruency effect
• ISSN: 2514-4820; 2514-4820
• DOI: 10.5334/joc.232

Proportion congruency (PC) effects on the strength of distractor interference were investigated in a high-powered (n = 109), pre-registered experiment in which participants had to identify the ink color of color words. Replicating the standard PC effect, Stroop interference was larger in blocks comprising mostly congruent word-color combinations, compared to blocks comprising mostly incongruent trials. These block-level differences in the strength of the Stroop effect were eliminated after controlling for (a) the congruency of the most recent episode in which the current word had been presented ("episodic retrieval of control states"), and also after controlling for (b) the response relation of this episode and the current trial ("episodic response retrieval"). Controlling for the congruency in trial n-1 (congruency sequence effect, CSE), irrespective of word relation did not eliminate the PC effect, nor did controlling for immediate exact and partial repetitions. When predicting PC effects simultaneously by both types of episodic retrieval processes, only episodic response retrieval explained the effect. Our findings attest to the importance of episodic response retrieval processes in explaining the PC effect in Stroop-like tasks in a confounded setup where different processes compete with each, and they speak against explanations in terms of a global adjustment of cognitive control settings or contingency learning under these conditions. The results further support the assumption that the most recent episode in which a stimulus had occurred is crucial for responding in the current trial (the "law of recency"; Giesen et al., 2020).