COVID‐19 pandemic and information diffusion analysis on Twitter

The COVID‐19 pandemic has impacted all aspects of our lives, including the information spread on social media. Prior literature has found that information diffusion dynamics on social networks mirror that of a virus, but applying the epidemic Susceptible‐Infected‐Removed model (SIR) model to examine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology Vol. 57; no. 1; pp. e252 - n/a
Main Authors Dinh, Ly, Parulian, Nikolaus
Format Journal Article Web Resource
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The COVID‐19 pandemic has impacted all aspects of our lives, including the information spread on social media. Prior literature has found that information diffusion dynamics on social networks mirror that of a virus, but applying the epidemic Susceptible‐Infected‐Removed model (SIR) model to examine how information spread is not sufficient to claim that information spreads like a virus. In this study, we explore whether there are similarities in the simulated SIR model (SIRsim), observed SIR model based on actual COVID‐19 cases (SIRemp), and observed information cascades on Twitter about the virus (INFOcas) by using network analysis and diffusion modeling. We propose three primary research questions: (a) What are the diffusion patterns of COVID‐19 virus spread, based on SIRsim and SIRemp? (b) What are the diffusion patterns of information cascades on Twitter (INFOcas), with respect to retweets, quote tweets, and replies? and (c) What are the major differences in diffusion patterns between SIRsim, SIRemp, and INFOcas? Our study makes a contribution to the information sciences community by showing how epidemic modeling of virus and information diffusion analysis of online social media are distinct but interrelated concepts.
Bibliography:These authors contributed equally to this work
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2373-9231
2373-9231
DOI:10.1002/pra2.252