Changing trends in the management of phaeochromocytoma

Background The recent experience of a specialist endocrine surgery unit in the management of phaeochromocytoma is reviewed. Methods Over a 14‐year period (June 1978 to June 1992) 43 patients (14 men, 29 women) with a mean age of 42 years were referred with phaeochromocytoma. Results Biochemical conf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of surgery Vol. 85; no. 1; pp. 117 - 120
Main Authors Geoghegan, J. G., Emberton, M., Bloom, S. R., Lynn, J. A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.01.1998
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background The recent experience of a specialist endocrine surgery unit in the management of phaeochromocytoma is reviewed. Methods Over a 14‐year period (June 1978 to June 1992) 43 patients (14 men, 29 women) with a mean age of 42 years were referred with phaeochromocytoma. Results Biochemical confirmation was usually by measurement of 24‐h urinary vallinylmandelic acid. From 1980 venous sampling was replaced by computed tomography as the primary localizing procedure. 131I‐meta‐iodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy was used in all patients between 1984 and 1987, but selectively after that. With regard to the operative approach used, between 1978 and 1983 midline or flank incisions were used, and from 1984 to 1992 subcostal or posterior approaches were used predominantly. There was one operative (30‐day) death. One patient died 24 months after operation from recurrent malignant phaeochromocytoma, and three patients died during follow‐up from unrelated causes. The remaining patients (mean follow‐up 30 months) have no evidence of recurrent phaeochromocytoma, although four remain on antihypertensive medication. Conclusion Improved imaging of phaeochromocytoma obviates the need for transperitoneal exploration, allowing selected phaeochromocytomas to be successfully managed using an extraperitoneal approach. © 1998 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd
Bibliography:ArticleID:BJS380
istex:12D37197D38E1D9BC04D9B84C7DB2738B37D77B1
ark:/67375/WNG-6TH0K7B3-D
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.02875.x