Vibrational Study on the Local Structure of Post-Synthesis and Hybrid Mesoporous Materials: Are There Fundamental Distinctions?
Organic–inorganic mesoporous materials of the MCM‐41 type are important materials that can be prepared by either post‐synthesis or one‐pot synthesis procedures. A complete control of the characteristics at a local level is of the utmost importance in view of the applications of such materials. Howev...
Saved in:
Published in | Chemistry : a European journal Vol. 13; no. 28; pp. 7874 - 7882 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Weinheim
WILEY-VCH Verlag
01.01.2007
WILEY‐VCH Verlag Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Organic–inorganic mesoporous materials of the MCM‐41 type are important materials that can be prepared by either post‐synthesis or one‐pot synthesis procedures. A complete control of the characteristics at a local level is of the utmost importance in view of the applications of such materials. However, there are not many studies relating such features with synthetic approaches. In this work, we prepared samples by post‐synthesis derivatization of materials from Si‐based MCM‐41, with bidentate nitrogen ligands bearing one or two silylated arms, and by one‐pot synthesis of organic–inorganic hybrid materials. The bulk properties of the two kinds of materials were comparable. Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy were used to investigate the local environment, namely, the number of OH groups and distribution of SiO4 units (large and small ring units). Hydrophilicity correlates with both the type of organic moiety used (mono‐ or disilylated), as well as with the synthetic procedure. The same vibrational studies showed how the structure in the channels changes as a function of pressure, reflecting the low mechanical stability of the mesoporous materials.
Local structure in mesoporous materials: Functionalized organic–inorganic mesoporous materials of the MCM‐41 type can be prepared by either post‐synthesis or one‐pot synthesis procedures. DRIFT and FT Raman spectroscopy were used to investigate the local environment (see picture). The hydrophilicity of the materials correlates with both the type of organic moiety used (mono‐ or disilylated) and with the synthetic procedure. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-80C608R2-N FCT SFRH/BPD/14512/2003 SFRH/BPD/14903/2004 ArticleID:CHEM200700310 istex:2B99B1B405E5A44ECBC0A543C33E7306CFFD580E SFRH/BD/18854/2004 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0947-6539 1521-3765 |
DOI: | 10.1002/chem.200700310 |