Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature

• Published in: European archives of paediatric dentistry Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 14 - 21
• Main Authors: Chadwick, B L, Evans, D J P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 01.03.2007; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Care and treatment; Composite Resins; Criteria; Dental caries; Dental Cavity Preparation; Dental materials; Dental matrices; Dental Restoration Failure; Dental Restoration, Permanent - methods; Dentistry; Glass ionomer cements; Glass Ionomer Cements - chemistry; Humans; Literature reviews; Molar; Patient outcomes; Pedodontics; Resins; Restoration; Teeth; Tooth, Deciduous; United Kingdom
• ISSN: 1818-6300; 1996-9805
• DOI: 10.1007/BF03262565

To review the literature concerning the restoration of primary teeth with glass ionomer (GIC) or resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGI) used in conventional class II cavities. A search of the literature identified through Medline between 1966 and 2006 using the key words: glass ionomer, resin modified, glass polyalkenoate, deciduous/primary teeth. Studies that used ART or tunnel preparations were excluded. Papers of relevant clinical studies (prospective and retrospective) were assessed and graded using predetermined criteria. Papers were graded according to the number of criteria met as (A >90%, B1 = 75%, B2 = 50%, C <50%). The search identified 411 papers, from which an application of the inclusion criteria yielded 20 studies. Of these, 2 were rated B1 and 18 B2. Failure rates varied from 6.6% to 60% for GIC, and from 2% to 24% for RMGI. GIC cannot be recommended for class II cavities in primary molars. There is evidence that RMGIC can perform successfully in small to moderate sized class II restorations.