The "Vanderbilt Boys" and the Modernization of Brazilian Economics

Economics as a scholarly discipline was transformed in Latin America during the 1960s and 1970s, when many countries in the region received financial and academic support from US institutions ostensibly aimed at "modernizing" the standards of training and research in the field. Even though...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHistory of political economy Vol. 53; no. 5; pp. 893 - 924
Main Authors Suprinyak, Carlos Eduardo, Fernández, Ramón García
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Durham Duke University Press 01.10.2021
Duke University Press, NC & IL
Subjects
Colleges & universities
Cooperation
Economics
European History
Financial institutions
History
International cooperation
Modernization
U.S. History
Brazil
Reynold Carlson
Vanderbilt University
University of São Paulo
sociology of economics
Ford Foundation
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Economics as a scholarly discipline was transformed in Latin America during the 1960s and 1970s, when many countries in the region received financial and academic support from US institutions ostensibly aimed at "modernizing" the standards of training and research in the field. Even though Chile remains the most well-known case, similar developments took place in Argentina, Colombia, Mexico, and elsewhere. In Brazil, the restructuring of economics derived much of its strength from a cooperation agreement signed between Vanderbilt University and the University of São Paulo, financially backed by USAID and the Ford Foundation. This article recovers the early postwar origins of this partnership, the process through which it was implemented during the 1960s, and its influence in reshaping Brazilian scholarly standards. Just as the University of Chicago left a lasting mark on Chilean economics, Vanderbilt also became a pervasive point of reference for the future development of the discipline in Brazil. Different actors, institutions, and contexts, however, ultimately produced quite distinct results in each case.
ISSN:0018-2702
1527-1919
DOI:10.1215/00182702-9395100