Genetic Variation among Sweetpotatoes Propagated through Nodal and Adventitious Sprouts

Genetic uniformity was assessed among sweetpotato ( Ipomoea batatas ) clones propagated through adventitious and nodal procedures. A single sprout each of `Jewel,' `Sumor,' and L87-95 was used as source of clonal plants that were simultaneously propagated through conventional adventitious...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Society for Horticultural Science Vol. 121; no. 2; pp. 170 - 174
Main Authors Villordon, Arthur Q, LaBonte, Don R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.03.1996
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Genetic uniformity was assessed among sweetpotato ( Ipomoea batatas ) clones propagated through adventitious and nodal procedures. A single sprout each of `Jewel,' `Sumor,' and L87-95 was used as source of clonal plants that were simultaneously propagated through conventional adventitious procedures and a tissue culture-based nodal culture technique. A sample of 15 decamer primers generated 64 scorable amplified fragments in a PCR-based assay, 29 of which were putatively polymorphic across n = 60 samples (10 each of nodal and adventitiously derived plants/genotype). Within adventitiously derived materials, putative polymorphisms ranged from 4.7% to 31.3% depending on the genotypic class. In contrast, putative polymorphisms ranged from 0.0% to 3.1% among nodally derived samples. Marker loci differentiated genotypes as well as putative marker phenotype variants through a multidimensional scaling analysis of the genetic similarity matrix. An `analysis of molecular variance' shows that genotypic effects accounted for 88.7% of the total molecular marker variability, while propagation effects (within genotypic groups) accounted for 11.3%. Results confirm that clonal plants derived from preexisting meristematic regions are more genetically uniform than plants propagated from adventitious origins.
ISSN:0003-1062
2327-9788
DOI:10.21273/jashs.121.2.170