Progenitor Mass Distribution of Core-collapse Supernova Remnants in Our Galaxy and Magellanic Clouds Based on Elemental Abundances

We investigate a progenitor mass distribution of core-collapse supernova remnants (CCSNRs) in our Galaxy and Large and Small Magellanic Clouds for the first time. We count the number of CCSNRs in three mass ranges divided by the zero-age main-sequence (ZAMS) mass, MZAMS; A: MZAMS < 15 M , B: 15 M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Astrophysical journal Vol. 863; no. 2; pp. 127 - 135
Main Authors Katsuda, Satoru, Takiwaki, Tomoya, Tominaga, Nozomu, Moriya, Takashi J., Nakamura, Ko
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia The American Astronomical Society 20.08.2018
IOP Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We investigate a progenitor mass distribution of core-collapse supernova remnants (CCSNRs) in our Galaxy and Large and Small Magellanic Clouds for the first time. We count the number of CCSNRs in three mass ranges divided by the zero-age main-sequence (ZAMS) mass, MZAMS; A: MZAMS < 15 M , B: 15 M < MZAMS < 22.5 M , C: MZAMS > 22.5 M . A simple compilation of progenitor masses in the literature yields a progenitor mass distribution of fA : fB : fC = 0.27:0.27:0.46, where f is the number fraction of the progenitors. The distribution is inconsistent with any standard initial mass functions (IMFs). We notice, however, that previous mass estimates are subject to large systematic uncertainties because most of the relative abundances (X/Si) are not good probes for the progenitor masses. Instead, we rely only on the Fe/Si ratio, which is sensitive to the CO core mass (MCOcore) and MZAMS. Comparing Fe/Si ratios in SN remnants in the literature with the newest theoretical model, we estimate 33 MCOcore and MZAMS, leading to a revised progenitor mass distribution of fA : fB : fC = 0.47:0.32:0.21. This is consistent with the standard Salpeter IMF. However, the relation between MCOcore and MZAMS could be affected by binary evolution, which is not taken into account in this study and should be considered in future work to derive a better progenitor mass distribution estimate.
Bibliography:AAS10854
Interstellar Matter and the Local Universe
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/aad2d8