Type I and Type III Interferons Differ in Their Adjuvant Activities for Influenza Vaccines

• Published in: Journal of virology Vol. 93; no. 23
• Main Authors: Ye, Liang, Ohnemus, Annette, Ong, Li Ching, Gad, Hans Henrik, Hartmann, Rune, Lycke, Nils, Staeheli, Peter
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Society for Microbiology 01.12.2019
• Subjects: immunization; interferons; Microbiology in the medical area; Mikrobiologi inom det medicinska området; mucosal adjuvants; Vaccines and Antiviral Agents; mucosal adjuvants; immunization; interferons
• ISSN: 0022-538X; 1098-5514; 1098-5514
• DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01262-19

Type I and type III interferons (IFNs) can promote adaptive immune responses in mice and improve vaccine-induced resistance to viral infections. The adjuvant effect of type III IFN (IFN-λ) specifically boosts mucosal immunity by an indirect mechanism, involving IFN-λ-induced production of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), a cytokine that activates immune cells. To date, it remained unclear whether the previously described adjuvant effect of type I IFN (IFN-α/β) would also depend on TSLP and whether type I IFN stimulates different antibody subtypes. Here, we show that after infection with a live attenuated influenza virus, mice lacking functional type I IFN receptors failed to produce normal amounts of virus-specific IgG2c and IgA antibodies. In contrast, mice lacking functional IFN-λ receptors contained normal levels of virus-specific IgG2c but had reduced IgG1 and IgA antibody levels. When applied together with protein antigen, IFN-α stimulated the production of antigen-specific IgA and IgG2c to a greater extent than IgG1, irrespective of whether the mice expressed functional TSLP receptors and irrespective of whether the vaccine was applied by the intranasal or the intraperitoneal route. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the adjuvant activities of type I and type III IFNs are mechanistically distinct. Interferons can shape antiviral immune responses, but it is not well understood how they influence vaccine efficacy. We find that type I IFN preferentially promotes the production of antigen-specific IgG2c and IgA antibodies after infection with a live attenuated influenza virus or after immunization with influenza subunit vaccines. In contrast, type III IFN specifically enhances influenza virus-specific IgG1 and IgA production. The adjuvant effect of type I IFN was not dependent on TSLP, which is essential for the adjuvant effect of type III IFN. Type I IFN boosted vaccine-induced antibody production after immunization by the intranasal or the intraperitoneal route, whereas type III IFN exhibited its adjuvant activity only when the vaccine was delivered by the mucosal route. Our findings demonstrate that type I and type III IFNs trigger distinct pathways to enhance the efficacy of vaccines. This knowledge might be used to design more efficient vaccines against infectious diseases.