Integrated primary care in Germany: the road ahead

Health care delivery in Germany is highly fragmented, resulting in poor vertical and horizontal integration and a system that is focused on curing acute illness or single diseases instead of managing patients with more complex or chronic conditions, or managing the health of determined populations....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of integrated care Vol. 9; no. 2; p. e14
Main Authors Schlette, Sophia, Lisac, Melanie, Blum, Kerstin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Ubiquity Press 20.04.2009
Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving
SeriesSpecial series: Integrated primary health care
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Health care delivery in Germany is highly fragmented, resulting in poor vertical and horizontal integration and a system that is focused on curing acute illness or single diseases instead of managing patients with more complex or chronic conditions, or managing the health of determined populations. While it is now widely accepted that a strong primary care system can help improve coordination and responsiveness in health care, primary care has so far not played this role in the German system. Primary care physicians traditionally do not have a gatekeeper function; patients can freely choose and directly access both primary and secondary care providers, making coordination and cooperation within and across sectors difficult. Since 2000, driven by the political leadership and initiative of the Federal Ministry of Health, the German Bundestag has passed several laws enabling new forms of care aimed to improve care coordination and to strengthen primary care as a key function in the German health care system. These include on the contractual side integrated care contracts, and on the delivery side disease management programmes, medical care centres, gatekeeping and 'community medicine nurses'. Recent policy reforms improved framework conditions for new forms of care. There is a clear commitment by the government and the introduction of selective contracting and financial incentives for stronger cooperation constitute major drivers for change. First evaluations, especially of disease management programmes, indicate that the new forms of care improve coordination and outcomes. Yet the process of strengthening primary care as a lever for better care coordination has only just begun. Future reforms need to address other structural barriers for change such as fragmented funding streams, inadequate payment systems, the lack of standardized IT systems and trans-sectoral education and training of providers.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
The authors all work as project managers for the International Network Health Policy and Reform, a project of the Germany-based Bertelsmann Stiftung (Foundation); Sophia Schlette is the Foundation’s Senior Expert Health Policy. The network brings together health policy experts from 20 industrialized countries who report biannually on health policy trends and developments in their countries. Reports and publications are published on the project’s internet database www.healthpolicymonitor.org. The purpose of the International Network Health Policy and Reform is to narrow the gap between international evidence and policy, providing timely information of what works and what does not work in health policy reform.
ISSN:1568-4156
1568-4156
DOI:10.5334/ijic.311