Preventive treatment for migraine in primary care, a population-based study in the Netherlands

Background Preventive treatment of migraine contributes to reducing the impact of migraine but its extent of use in routine care is unknown. Objective The objective of this article is to assess current use, previous use, duration and course of preventive treatment of migraine in Dutch general practi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCephalalgia Vol. 33; no. 14; pp. 1170 - 1178
Main Authors Dekker, F, Dieleman, JP, Neven, A Knuistingh, Ferrari, MD, Assendelft, WJJ
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.10.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Preventive treatment of migraine contributes to reducing the impact of migraine but its extent of use in routine care is unknown. Objective The objective of this article is to assess current use, previous use, duration and course of preventive treatment of migraine in Dutch general practice. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study, for the period between 1997 and 2007, in the Interdisciplinary Processing of Clinical Information (IPCI) database, a GP research database in the Netherlands (source population of more than half a million subjects). All prevalent and incident migraine patients (N = 7367) were included. Results About 13% of all migraine patients currently use preventive therapy and almost half of migraine patients have prior use. Of those starting with preventive treatment, 56% (95% CI: 54.3–64.7) still used it after nine months. There was a long delay between migraine diagnosis and preventive treatment start. Forty-four percent (95% CI 43.0–45.7) started preventive therapy in the study period. Conclusion This large primary-care database study shows that a limited number of patients are current users of preventive treatment, but many patients have prior use. After diagnosis there is often an extended time before preventive treatment is applied. Also there is often only one attempt. The continuation in time seems appropriate. Preventive therapy in migraine still deserves focus.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0333-1024
1468-2982
DOI:10.1177/0333102413490343