Catalytic direct conversion of ethane to value-added chemicals under microwave irradiation

[Display omitted] •Over 80 % of ethane conversion was achieved under microwave irradiation at 375 °C.•The conventional reactor required a temperature of 660 °C to achieve 80 % conversion.•The microwave selectivity to ethylene was higher than the conventional reactor.•The conventional fixed bed had a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCatalysis today Vol. 356; pp. 3 - 10
Main Authors Robinson, Brandon, Caiola, Ashley, Bai, Xinwei, Abdelsayed, Victor, Shekhawat, Dushyant, Hu, Jianli
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier B.V 01.10.2020
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] •Over 80 % of ethane conversion was achieved under microwave irradiation at 375 °C.•The conventional reactor required a temperature of 660 °C to achieve 80 % conversion.•The microwave selectivity to ethylene was higher than the conventional reactor.•The conventional fixed bed had a higher aromatic yield then the microwave reactor.•The spent microwave sample resulted in less total coke formation. The reaction mechanism of ethane conversion over 4 % Mo-0.5 % Fe/ZSM-5 catalyst was investigated using two different reactors with different heating modes. A microwave fixed-bed reactor (MWFB) was used and its performance was compared to a conventional thermal fixed-bed reactor (CTFB). Over 80 % ethane conversion was achieved under microwave irradiation mode at 375 °C. To achieve the same ethane conversion conventionally, the reaction temperature had to be elevated to 660 °C in the CTFB. The formation rates and selectivity of the products were compared under these two heating methods. The CTFB products had a higher selectivity towards aromatic compounds; whereas, the MWFB products had a higher selectivity towards ethylene; 26.5 % higher than the CTFB. Carbon analysis over spent catalysts of CTFB showed three distinct types of coke, whereas the microwave resulted in a single higher temperature coke type.
Bibliography:USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Energy Efficiency Office. Advanced Manufacturing Office
EE0007888
ISSN:0920-5861
1873-4308
DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2020.03.001