The Liberal Peace Revisited: The Role of Democracy, Dependence, and Development in Militarized Interstate Dispute Initiation, 1950-1999

We test a model of the liberal peace by examining the initiation of militarized interstate disputes at the monadic level of analysis from 1950-1999. Liberal peace theory contends that both economic dependence and democratic political systems reduce conflict propensities. Extant empirical analyses of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational interactions Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. 183 - 200
Main Authors Souva, Mark, Prins, Brandon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Taylor & Francis Group 01.07.2006
Subjects
Conflict
Foreign direct investment
liberal peace
Liberals
Peace
Political systems
Trade
trade openness
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:We test a model of the liberal peace by examining the initiation of militarized interstate disputes at the monadic level of analysis from 1950-1999. Liberal peace theory contends that both economic dependence and democratic political systems reduce conflict propensities. Extant empirical analyses of the monadic liberal peace, however, are under-specified. First, the concept of economic dependence not only includes trade, but also foreign investment. Second, existing models do not control for the influence of economic development. Previous research on the monadic liberal peace has also failed to distinguish between the initiation of conflict and participation in conflict. We find evidence for a liberal peace: trade dependence, foreign investment, and democracy reduce a state's propensity to initiate militarized disputes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0305-0629
1547-7444
DOI:10.1080/03050620600719361