Freeze-Thaw cycle representation alters response of watershed hydrology to future climate change

•Different Freeze-Thaw cycle models were compared in projecting hydrology;•Physically based Freeze-Thaw cycle representation projected less frozen days;•Streamflow simulation was not sensitive to Freeze-Thaw cycle representation;•Surface and subsurface runoff contributions responded differentially;•...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCatena (Giessen) Vol. 195; no. C; p. 104767
Main Authors Wang, Qianfeng, Qi, Junyu, Wu, Huan, Zeng, Yue, Shui, Wei, Zeng, Jingyu, Zhang, Xuesong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany Elsevier B.V 01.12.2020
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Different Freeze-Thaw cycle models were compared in projecting hydrology;•Physically based Freeze-Thaw cycle representation projected less frozen days;•Streamflow simulation was not sensitive to Freeze-Thaw cycle representation;•Surface and subsurface runoff contributions responded differentially;•Accurate Freeze-Thaw cycle representation is critical for credible assessment. Hydrologic models are widely used for projecting influences of changing climate on water resources. In this study, we compared the original Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model and an enhanced version of SWAT model with physically based Freeze-Thaw cycle representation (SWAT-FT) for simulating future annual ET, stream flow, water yield, surface runoff, and subsurface runoff in the Upper Mississippi River Basin (UMRB). SWAT-FT projected fewer frozen days than the original SWAT model due to its better representation of snow cover insulation effects. Both models derived declining trends in annual streamflow and terrestrial water yield in the late 21st century due to increased ET under warmer climate. However, these two models exhibited contrasting mechanisms underlying the streamflow decline. For original SWAT model, the decrease in surface runoff was the major driver, while for SWAT-FT, reduced subsurface runoff was the main cause. In general, the original SWAT model predicted more surface runoff and less subsurface runoff than SWAT-FT. Further geospatial inspection shows large discrepancies between these two models, particularly in the northern colder parts of the UMRB, where the maximum differences in annual surface and subsurface runoff reached 130 mm yr−1 and 140 mm yr−1, respectively. Collectively, the results demonstrate the importance of accounting for Freeze-Thaw cycles for reliable projection of future water resources.
Bibliography:USDOE
ISSN:0341-8162
1872-6887
DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2020.104767