An Analysis of Formal Patient Complaints, Risk, and Malpractice Events Involving Orthopedic Trauma Surgeons During a 10-Year Period

• Published in: Orthopedics (Thorofare, N.J.) Vol. 46; no. 2; pp. 121 - 127
• Main Authors: Grandizio, Louis C, Barreto Rocha, Daniela F, Hayes, Daniel, Warnick, Eugene P, Doyle, Catherine M, Suk, Michael, Klena, Joel C, Horwitz, Daniel S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Slack, Inc 01.03.2023; SLACK INCORPORATED
• Subjects: Evaluation; Humans; Litigation; Malpractice; Medical malpractice; Medical personnel; Methods; Orthopedic Procedures - adverse effects; Orthopedic Surgeons; Orthopedists; Patient advocacy; Patient safety; Patient satisfaction; Practice; Retrospective Studies; Surgeons; United States
• ISSN: 0147-7447; 1938-2367
• DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20221129-05

Formal patient complaints and malpractice events involving orthopedic trauma surgeons (OTSs) can have substantial career implications. Our purpose was to analyze formal patient complaints, risk events, and malpractice events against OTSs during a 10-year period. We reviewed all formal patient complaints within our institution's patient advocacy database involving 9 fellowship-trained OTSs throughout a decade. Complaints were categorized using the Patient Complaint Analysis System. Potential risk and malpractice events involving the OTSs were recorded. A control group of all patients seen by the surgeons during the study period was created. Demographics between patients with complaints and the control group were analyzed, as were malpractice, risk, and complaint rates between the surgeons. Of 33,770 patients, 136 filed a formal complaint (0.40%). There were 29 malpractice claims and 2 malpractice lawsuits. The care and treatment domain accounted for the highest percentage of complaints (36%), followed by the access and availability domain (26%). Results of the logistic regression analysis indicated that private insurance (odds ratio, 1.58) and operative treatment (odds ratio, 3.65) were significantly associated with complaints. Despite statistically significant differences in the rates of complaint and risk events between surgeons, malpractice events did not differ. The rate of patient complaints within a large orthopedic trauma practice during a 10-year period was 0.40%. Patients with private insurance and those treated operatively were more likely to file a complaint. Whereas complaint rates among surgeons varied, there was no significant difference in the rate of malpractice events. Understanding patient complaint rates and categorizations may allow surgeons to target areas for improvement. [ . 2023;46(2):121-127.].