Where Does Teaching Multiperspectivity in History Education Begin and End? An Analysis of the Uses of Temporality

• Published in: Theory and research in social education Vol. 46; no. 4; pp. 495 - 527
• Main Authors: Wansink, Bjorn, Akkerman, Sanne, Zuiker, Itzél, Wubbels, Theo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Routledge 02.10.2018
• Subjects: Conflict; Death; European History; expert teachers; Foreign Countries; history; History Instruction; Jews; Lesson Plans; Moral Values; multiperspectivity; Perspective Taking; Political Attitudes; Secondary School Teachers; sensitive topics; Slavery; Specialists; Teacher Attitudes; Teaching Methods; temporality; Time Perspective; Video Technology; Netherlands
• ISSN: 0093-3104; 2163-1654
• DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2018.1480439

This study reports five Dutch expert history teachers' approaches to multiperspectivity in lessons on three topics varying in moral sensitivity (i.e., the Dutch Revolt, Slavery, and the Holocaust) and their underlying considerations for addressing subjects' perspectives in different temporal layers. The lessons were observed and videorecorded, and the teachers were interviewed. Lessons were analyzed using a theoretical framework in which three different temporal layers of perspectives were distinguished, each with its own educational function. Teachers addressed multiple temporal layers and functions of multiperspectivity in almost all of their lessons. However, teachers' focus on temporal layers and function differed between lessons. Four categories of considerations for or against introducing specific subjects' perspectives were found: functional, moral, pedagogical, and practical. Moreover, teachers engaged in "normative balancing," meaning that not all perspectives were perceived as equally valid or politically desirable, showing where multiperspectivity ends.