Use of Advanced Energy Devices and Fiberoptic Retractors in Single-Incision Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer

• Published in: Yonsei medical journal Vol. 65; no. 9; pp. 511 - 518
• Main Authors: Kim, Hye Jin, Shin, Dong-Min, Cho, Junho, Lee, Kwanbum, Lee, Jeea, Park, Hyung Seok
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Korea (South) Yonsei University College of Medicine 01.09.2024; 연세대학교의과대학
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Axilla - surgery; Breast Neoplasms - pathology; Breast Neoplasms - surgery; Electrocoagulation - instrumentation; Electrocoagulation - methods; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision - instrumentation; Lymph Node Excision - methods; Mastectomy, Segmental - instrumentation; Mastectomy, Segmental - methods; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Original; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; 의학일반; breast neoplasm; minimally invasive surgical procedures/methods; surgical instruments; Segmental mastectomy; minimally invasive surgical procedures/instrumentation; surgical wound
• ISSN: 0513-5796; 1976-2437; 1976-2437
• DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0348

The use of advanced energy devices for mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection can reduce perioperative blood loss, seroma formation, and drainage duration/volume. Retraction using fiberoptic retractors can help visualize deep and narrow surgical fields. We aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes between single-incision breast-conserving surgery (SIBCS) and conventional breast-conserving surgery (CBCS) with axillary staging using advanced energy devices and conventional equipment, respectively. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 244 patients who underwent BCS with axillary surgery between March 2018 and September 2019 at Severance Hospital. The patients were grouped based on the device used to aid in axillary staging: CBCS group (n=117) used conventional electrocautery; and SIBCS group (n=127) used advanced energy devices and fiberoptic retractors. The two groups were compared for postoperative outcomes. The mean patient age was 55.9 and 53.1 years in the CBCS and SIBCS groups, respectively. Incision size was significantly smaller in the SIBCS group than in the CBCS group (6.3±2.1 cm vs. 7.5±2.5 cm, =0.044). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operating time (126.0±40.0 min vs. 127.0±63.0 min, =0.828), operative blood loss (11.0±31.0 mL vs. 7.0±18.0 mL, =0.100), drainage duration (7.0±3.0 d vs. 8.0±4.0 d, =0.288), and complications (1.70% vs. 2.36%, =0.523). Using advanced energy devices for SIBCS with axillary staging reduced incision size and provided better cosmetic outcomes compared to those using the conventional method. Advanced energy devices may offer better surgical outcomes in patients who undergo BCS with axillary staging.