Taxonomic free sorting

► We propose a procedure of evaluation called taxonomic free sorting. ► This procedure gives better insight into product perception than free sorting task. ► The data from each subject can be organized into a hierarchical structure. ► Nonmetric MDS is used to analyse the data. Free sorting is a quic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood quality and preference Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 30 - 35
Main Authors Courcoux, P., Qannari, E.M., Taylor, Y., Buck, D., Greenhoff, K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► We propose a procedure of evaluation called taxonomic free sorting. ► This procedure gives better insight into product perception than free sorting task. ► The data from each subject can be organized into a hierarchical structure. ► Nonmetric MDS is used to analyse the data. Free sorting is a quick and reliable means to assess similarities among a set of stimuli by a panel of subjects. In this procedure, subjects form as many groups of stimuli as they consider necessary, with the understanding that each group is formed with stimuli that are perceived as similar. However, no information is available about the structure of the groups formed by each subject. In practice, these groups are considered as equally distant from each other. This is a questionable assumption as it may not reflect the perception of the subjects towards the stimuli. Taxonomic free sorting is designed to cope with this problem. Once the subjects have achieved the free sorting of the stimuli, they are instructed to organize, step by step, the stimuli into a hierarchical structure thus giving more insight into the similarities among products. Statistical treatments of the data thus obtained are discussed and the procedure of evaluation is illustrated on the basis of a case study.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0950-3293
1873-6343
DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.04.001