Computed tomography and ultrasonographic evaluation of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with surgicoclinicopathologic correlation

The detection of cervical lymph nodal metastasis and carotid artery invasion by metastatic lymph nodes is an important issue in the management of head and neck malignancies. This study compared the evaluation of metastasis by palpation, ultrasonography (USG) and computed tomography (CT) in patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of laryngology and otology Vol. 116; no. 3; pp. 194 - 199
Main Authors Sarvanan, K., Bapuraj, J. Rajiv, Sharma, Suresh C., Radotra, B. D., Khandelwal, N., Suri, S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.03.2002
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The detection of cervical lymph nodal metastasis and carotid artery invasion by metastatic lymph nodes is an important issue in the management of head and neck malignancies. This study compared the evaluation of metastasis by palpation, ultrasonography (USG) and computed tomography (CT) in patients with known head and neck malignancies. Twenty-five consecutive patients with head and neck malignancy were prospectively evaluated for the presence of cervical lymphadenopathy and carotid artery invasion. All patients underwent clinical examination (palpation), USG and CT examination. A modified CT criteria was employed which yielded acceptable results for the detection of metastatic nodes. Radical neck dissection was performed for 26 neck sides, and the results of pre-operative evaluation were confirmed by the surgical and histopathological findings. Palpation, ultrasound and CT have comparable sensitivity in the determination of metastasis involving cervical lymph nodes. Thus palpation should be employed as the primary method of assessment of secondaries in the neck. However, palpation is less sensitive than CT and USG in the detection of carotid artery involvement, hence the clinical suspicion of arterial invasion should be confirmed by either CT or USG which have similar accuracy in the detection of carotid artery invasion.
Bibliography:istex:3ABFD6461BF720A63354A70C3AB2BC7CB156010C
ark:/67375/6GQ-7DQRJCPH-0
PII:S0022215102000580
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0022-2151
1748-5460
DOI:10.1258/0022215021910519