Small but attractive: female-biased nectar production and floral visitors in a dimorphic shrub

In sexually dimorphic species, hermaphrodite flowers in gynodioecious species or male flowers in dioecious species are often larger and produce more nectar than their conspecific female flowers. As a consequence, hermaphrodite or male flowers frequently receive more pollinator visits. Sex ratio, flo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 160 - 164
Main Authors Cervantes, C, Alvarez, A, Cuevas, E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In sexually dimorphic species, hermaphrodite flowers in gynodioecious species or male flowers in dioecious species are often larger and produce more nectar than their conspecific female flowers. As a consequence, hermaphrodite or male flowers frequently receive more pollinator visits. Sex ratio, flower size, floral display, nectar production and floral visits were evaluated in two natural populations of Fuchsia thymifolia, a morphologically gynodioecious but functionally subdioecious insect-pollinated shrub. Sex ratio did not differ from the expected 1:1 in the two studied populations. As expected, hermaphrodite flowers were larger than female flowers, but in contrast to the general pattern, hermaphrodite flowers did not produce nectar or produced much less than female flowers. Flower visitors were flies (68%) and bumblebees (24%), both of which showed a preference for female flowers. No sex difference was detected in either flower longevity or floral display across the flowering season. Higher nectar production by females may attract more pollinators, and may be a strategy to enhance female reproductive success in this species. Finally, floral dimorphism and insect preferences did not seem to hamper the maintenance of sub-dioecy or prevent the evolution of dioecy in F. thymifolia.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1435-8603
1438-8677
DOI:10.1111/plb.12653