Effect of relation or effect of investment? Procedural justice and physician authority as factors shaping the well-being of patients

PurposeThe aim of the study was to determine the predictive power of two relational factors, procedural justice and legitimacy, against the well-being of patients receiving medical care.Design/methodology/approachThe study sample consisted of 590 patients in treatment for somatic conditions in hospi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of health organization and management Vol. 39; no. 5; pp. 628 - 640
Main Authors Prusiński, Tomasz, Burdziej, Stanisław, Główczewski, Michał
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Emerald Publishing Limited 25.06.2025
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:PurposeThe aim of the study was to determine the predictive power of two relational factors, procedural justice and legitimacy, against the well-being of patients receiving medical care.Design/methodology/approachThe study sample consisted of 590 patients in treatment for somatic conditions in hospital outpatient clinics. The study was conducted in a correlational scheme. Subjects evaluated their relationship with their chosen doctor. In order to verify the hypotheses, SEM was carried out.FindingsThe relationship effect was noted. Procedural justice was a significant and positive predictor of psychological well-being, while distributive justice, i.e. time and money invested by the patient in their treatment, was not. The perceived legitimacy of the doctor was not a significant predictor of the psychological well-being of their patient. The relationship between the experience of procedural justice and psychological well-being was serially mediated by patients’ perceived physician legitimacy and perceived life satisfaction.Originality/valueRelational factors shape treatment outcomes operationalized by patients’ subjective sense of well-being. Fair patient handling is a predictor of positive treatment outcomes.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1477-7266
1758-7247
1758-7247
DOI:10.1108/JHOM-03-2024-0091