Risk assessment of herbicides compared to other pesticides in Brazil

The use of herbicides is essential to preserve the productivity and efficiency of crops in land use and growth factors. The general public has questioned the use of herbicides and pesticides, even when used rationally and following the procedures approved by regulatory agencies. It is essential to p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAdvances in Weed Science Vol. 39; p. e21202032
Main Authors Carbonari, Caio A., Velini, Edivaldo D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Portuguese
Published Londrina Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas, UFV - Depto de Fitotecnia 01.01.2021
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas - SBCPD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The use of herbicides is essential to preserve the productivity and efficiency of crops in land use and growth factors. The general public has questioned the use of herbicides and pesticides, even when used rationally and following the procedures approved by regulatory agencies. It is essential to present accurate information about these products’ use and the risk associated with this use in this context. The mean dose and the Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ) continuously decreased as a function of the year of release of new active ingredients with herbicidal action in Brazil, which indicates that the new products are more efficient and present lower risks to the environment, farmworkers and consumers. The mean EIQ for each herbicide application in soybean, maize, sugarcane, and cotton has decreased in Brazil. The proportion of herbicides in the number of applications has decreased compared to other classes of pesticides, except for cotton. The risk of products decreased over time, with continuous reductions in EIQ values per unit of the treated area; the EIQ values determined per production remained stable despite the increased complexity of pest management, which caused an increase in the number of applications.
ISSN:2675-9462
2675-9462
DOI:10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2021;39:00006