Arthroplasty for tenosynovial giant cell tumors 17 patients followed for 0.2 to 15 years
Background and purpose - Tenosynovial giant cell tumors (t-GCTs) can behave aggressively locally and affect joint function and quality of life. The role of arthroplasty in the treatment of t-GCT is uncertain. We report the results of arthroplasty in t-GCT patients. Patients and methods - t-GCT patie...
Saved in:
Published in | Acta orthopaedica Vol. 87; no. 5; pp. 497 - 503 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Taylor & Francis
02.09.2016
Medical Journals Sweden |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background and purpose - Tenosynovial giant cell tumors (t-GCTs) can behave aggressively locally and affect joint function and quality of life. The role of arthroplasty in the treatment of t-GCT is uncertain. We report the results of arthroplasty in t-GCT patients.
Patients and methods - t-GCT patients (12 knee, 5 hip) received an arthroplasty between 1985 and 2015. Indication for arthroplasty, recurrences, complications, quality of life, and functional scores were evaluated after a mean follow-up time of 5.5 (0.2-15) years.
Results - 2 patients had recurrent disease. 2 other patients had implant loosening. Functional scores showed poor results in almost half of the knee patients. 4 of the hip patients scored excellent and 1 scored fair. Quality of life was reduced in 1 or more subscales for 2 hip patients and for 5 knee patients.
Interpretation - In t-GCT patients with extensive disease or osteoarthritis, joint arthroplasty is an additional treatment option. However, recurrences, implant loosening, and other complications do occur, even after several years. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1745-3674 1745-3682 |
DOI: | 10.1080/17453674.2016.1205168 |