Safety and efficacy of consecutive cycles of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, and an intracoronary CD133+ cell infusion in patients with chronic refractory ischemic heart disease: The G-CSF in Angina patients with IHD to stimulate Neovascularization (GAIN I) trial
Background Preclinical studies suggest granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) holds promise for treating ischemic heart disease; however; its clinical safety and efficacy in this setting remain unclear. We elected to evaluate the safety and efficacy of G-CSF administration in patients with re...
Saved in:
Published in | The American heart journal Vol. 156; no. 5; pp. 954 - 963 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Mosby, Inc
01.11.2008
Elsevier Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background Preclinical studies suggest granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) holds promise for treating ischemic heart disease; however; its clinical safety and efficacy in this setting remain unclear. We elected to evaluate the safety and efficacy of G-CSF administration in patients with refractory “no-option” ischemic heart disease. Methods Twenty patients (18 males, 2 females, mean age 62.4 years) were enrolled and underwent baseline cardiac ischemia assessment (CA) (angina questionnaire, exercise stress test [EST], technetium Tc 99m sestamibi and dobutamine-stress echocardiographic imaging). Patients then received open-label G-CSF commencing at 10 μg/kg SC for 5 days, with an EST on days 4 and 6 (to facilitate myocardial cytokine generation and stem cell trafficking). After 3 months, CA and the same regimen of G-CSF + ESTs were repeated but, in addition, leukapheresis and a randomized double-blinded intracoronary infusion of CD133+ or unselected cells were performed. Final CA occurred 3 months thereafter. Results There were no deaths, but only 16 patients were permitted to complete the study. Eight events fulfilled prespecified “adverse event” criteria, including 4 troponin I–positive events and 2 episodes of thrombocytopenia. Also, frequent minor troponin I–positive events (troponin I <0.9 μg/L) were observed, which did not meet adverse event criteria. The administration of consecutive cycles of G-CSF resulted in stepwise improvements in anginal frequency, EST performance, and Duke treadmill scores (all P < .005). However, from baseline to final follow-up, technetium Tc 99m sestamibi and dobutamine-stress echocardiographic results were unchanged. Conclusions Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administration was associated with improvement in a range of subjective outcomes. However, adverse events were common, and objective measures of cardiac perfusion/ischemia were unchanged. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0002-8703 1097-6744 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.04.034 |