Implementation of a clinical reasoning curriculum for clerkship-level medical students: a pseudo-randomized and controlled study

• Published in: Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany) Vol. 6; no. 2; pp. 165 - 172
• Main Authors: Bonifacino, Eliana, Follansbee, William P., Farkas, Amy H., Jeong, Kwonho, McNeil, Melissa A., DiNardo, Deborah J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany De Gruyter 26.06.2019
• Subjects: Clinical Clerkship; Clinical Decision-Making; clinical reasoning; Curriculum; Education, Medical, Undergraduate; Educational Measurement - statistics & numerical data; Health Plan Implementation; Humans; Internal Medicine - education; medical education – curriculum development/evaluation; medical education – undergraduate; Students, Medical; Writing; clinical reasoning; medical education – undergraduate; medical education – curriculum development/evaluation
• ISSN: 2194-8011; 2194-802X
• DOI: 10.1515/dx-2018-0063

Background The National Academies of Sciences report Improving Diagnosis in Healthcare highlighted the need for better training in medical decision-making, but most medical schools lack formal education in clinical reasoning. Methods We conducted a pseudo-randomized and controlled study to evaluate the impact of a clinical reasoning curriculum in an internal medicine clerkship. Students in the intervention group completed six interactive online modules focused on reasoning concepts and a skills-based workshop. We assessed the impact of the curriculum on clinical reasoning knowledge and skills and perception of education by evaluating: (1) performance on a clinical reasoning concept quiz, (2) demonstration of reasoning in hospital admission notes, and (3) awareness of attending physician utilization of clinical reasoning concepts. Results Students in the intervention group demonstrated superior performance on the clinical reasoning knowledge quiz (67% vs. 54%, p < 0.001). Students in the intervention group demonstrated superior written reasoning skills in the data synthesis (2.3 vs. 2.0, p = 0.02) and diagnostic reasoning (2.2 vs. 1.9, p = 0.02) portions of their admission notes, and reported more discussion of clinical reasoning by their attending physicians. Conclusions Exposure to a clinical reasoning curriculum was associated with superior reasoning knowledge and superior written demonstration of clinical reasoning skills by third-year medical students on an internal medicine clerkship.