Demoted leaders and exiled candidates: Disentangling party and person in the voter’s mind

• Published in: Electoral studies Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 628 - 635
• Main Authors: van Holsteyn, Joop J.M., Andeweg, Rudy B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2010
• Subjects: Candidates; Counterfactual thought experiments; Elections; Electoral behaviour; Evaluation; Nomination; Open list PR; Party leadership; Personality; Personalization; Political Parties; Preference voting; Preferential voting; Voters; Voting; Counterfactual thought experiments; Open list PR; Personalization; Preference voting
• ISSN: 0261-3794; 1873-6890
• DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.06.003

The debate on personalization in electoral politics is inconclusive. There is confusion about the concept of personalization. Moreover, the fact that party evaluation and person evaluation are interrelated complicates the debate. This paper focuses on the latter problem by employing counterfactual thought experiments in which voters are asked to simulate their vote with their candidate lower on the party list or nominated by another party. The results show that most voters put party above person and less than ten percent put person above party. A sizeable third category has a preference for an individual candidate as long as that candidate does not leave the party. Also, personalization is slightly more important with regard to (the leaders of) populist parties, and individual candidates are more important for voters with less education, less political knowledge and a less deeply rooted party preference.