M-Health for Improving Screening Accuracy of Acute Malnutrition in a Community-Based Management of Acute Malnutrition Program in Mumbai Informal Settlements

• Published in: Food and nutrition bulletin Vol. 37; no. 4; p. 504
• Main Authors: Chanani, Sheila, Wacksman, Jeremy, Deshmukh, Devika, Pantvaidya, Shanti, Fernandez, Armida, Jayaraman, Anuja
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.12.2016
• Subjects: Child, Preschool; Community Health Services - methods; Female; Humans; India; Infant; Male; Malnutrition - diagnosis; Mobile Applications; Nutritional Status; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; anthropometric measurements; malnutrition; community health care; nutritional status; scaling up nutrition; India
• ISSN: 1564-8265
• DOI: 10.1177/0379572116657241

Acute malnutrition is linked to child mortality and morbidity. Community-Based Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) programs can be instrumental in large-scale detection and treatment of undernutrition. The World Health Organization (WHO) 2006 weight-for-height/length tables are diagnostic tools available to screen for acute malnutrition. Frontline workers (FWs) in a CMAM program in Dharavi, Mumbai, were using CommCare, a mobile application, for monitoring and case management of children in combination with the paper-based WHO simplified tables. A strategy was undertaken to digitize the WHO tables into the CommCare application. To measure differences in diagnostic accuracy in community-based screening for acute malnutrition, by FWs, using a mobile-based solution. Twenty-seven FWs initially used the paper-based tables and then switched to an updated mobile application that included a nutritional grade calculator. Human error rates specifically associated with grade classification were calculated by comparison of the grade assigned by the FW to the grade each child should have received based on the same WHO tables. Cohen kappa coefficient, sensitivity and specificity rates were also calculated and compared for paper-based grade assignments and calculator grade assignments. Comparing FWs (N = 14) who completed at least 40 screenings without and 40 with the calculator, the error rates were 5.5% and 0.7%, respectively (p < .0001). Interrater reliability (κ) increased to an almost perfect level (>.90), from .79 to .97, after switching to the mobile calculator. Sensitivity and specificity also improved significantly. The mobile calculator significantly reduces an important component of human error in using the WHO tables to assess acute malnutrition at the community level.