Conventional versus Instillation Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for Severe Soft Tissue Injury in Open Pelvic Fractures: A Retrospective Review

We investigated the clinical features, current negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) management strategies, and outcomes of pelvic-perineal soft tissue infection after open pelvic fractures. We analyzed the data of patients admitted to our trauma center with pelvic-perineal soft tissue after open p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inYonsei medical journal Vol. 66; no. 2; pp. 94 - 102
Main Authors Choi, Donghwan, Cho, Won Tae, Song, Hyung Keun, Kwon, Junsik, Kang, Byung Hee, Jung, Hohyung, Kim, Min Ji, Jung, Kyoungwon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Yonsei University College of Medicine 01.02.2025
연세대학교의과대학
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0513-5796
1976-2437
1976-2437
DOI10.3349/ymj.2023.0473

Cover

More Information
Summary:We investigated the clinical features, current negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) management strategies, and outcomes of pelvic-perineal soft tissue infection after open pelvic fractures. We analyzed the data of patients admitted to our trauma center with pelvic-perineal soft tissue after open pelvic fractures over a 7-year period. We investigated the injury severity score (ISS), medical costs, number of NPWTs, time required to reach definite wound coverage, complications, fracture classifications, transfusion requirements, interventions, length of stay (LOS) in hospital and intensive care unit (ICU), and prognosis. Twenty patients with open pelvic fractures were treated with NPWT, and one patient who underwent NPWT died of pelvic sepsis during ICU treatment. The median LOS in hospital and medical costs were 98 [56-164] days and 106400 [65600-171100] USD, respectively. Patients treated with instillation NPWT (iNPWT, n=10) had a shorter NPWT duration (24 [13-39] vs. 46 [42-91] days, =0.023), time to definite wound coverage (30 [21-43] vs. 49 [42-93] days, =0.026), and hospital LOS (56 [43-72] vs. 158 [101-192] days, =0.001), as well as lower medical costs (67800 [42500-102500] vs. 144200 [110400-236000] USD, =0.009) compared to those treated with conventional NPWT. NPWT is a feasible method for treating pelvic soft tissue infections in patients with open pelvic fractures. iNPWT can reduce the duration of NPWT, hospital LOS, and medical costs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
https://www.eymj.org/DOIx.php?id=10.3349/ymj.2023.0473
ISSN:0513-5796
1976-2437
1976-2437
DOI:10.3349/ymj.2023.0473