Monitoring the introduction of a surgical intervention with long-term consequences

Surgical innovations are often introduced for their expected long‐term benefits, but the decision to abandon the existing treatment must be based on the available short‐term data and rational judgment. We present a framework for monitoring the introduction of a surgical intervention with long‐term c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStatistics in medicine Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 512 - 531
Main Authors Gorst-Rasmussen, A., Spiegelhalter, D. J., Bull, C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 10.02.2007
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Surgical innovations are often introduced for their expected long‐term benefits, but the decision to abandon the existing treatment must be based on the available short‐term data and rational judgment. We present a framework for monitoring the introduction of a surgical intervention with long‐term consequences and failure‐time endpoints. The framework is based on Bayesian methods, and formally combines study data, clinical opinion, and external evidence to construct a posterior survival function from which intuitive summary statistics can be extracted to aid decision making. It incorporates learning effects and is adaptable to a wide variety of settings. The methods are illustrated on survival data from a cohort of 325 consecutive neonates treated for simple transposition of the great arteries with either the Senning or the Switch operation during the period 1978–1998. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:istex:BBAB922DEA7C666A859F0CCD462A1B794503B7D1
ArticleID:SIM2548
ark:/67375/WNG-DDFR8XS3-7
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0277-6715
1097-0258
DOI:10.1002/sim.2548