Practising Development at Home: Race, Gender, and the "Development" of the American South

Drawing on a range of works that extend from gendered historical analyses of colonialism to critical histories of development, and based on archival research in Alabama, Arkansas, and Mississippi, I argue in this paper that what we now call international development—a form of hegemony different from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAntipode Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 915 - 941
Main Author Domosh, Mona
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Drawing on a range of works that extend from gendered historical analyses of colonialism to critical histories of development, and based on archival research in Alabama, Arkansas, and Mississippi, I argue in this paper that what we now call international development—a form of hegemony different from but related to colonialism—needs to be understood not only as a geopolitical tool of the Cold War, but also as a technique of governance that took shape within the realm of the domestic and through a racialized gaze. I do so by tracing some of the key elements of the US international development practices in the postwar era to a different time and place: the American South, a region considered “undeveloped” in the first decades of the twentieth century, and the agricultural extension practices that targeted the rural farm home and farm women, particularly African‐American women.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-0C7ZWNST-Q
National Science Foundation - No. 1262774
ArticleID:ANTI12138
istex:43E89E3B360A8146FB30CD33B49DC090FF56D619
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0066-4812
1467-8330
DOI:10.1111/anti.12138