Practising Development at Home: Race, Gender, and the "Development" of the American South
Drawing on a range of works that extend from gendered historical analyses of colonialism to critical histories of development, and based on archival research in Alabama, Arkansas, and Mississippi, I argue in this paper that what we now call international development—a form of hegemony different from...
Saved in:
Published in | Antipode Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 915 - 941 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.09.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Drawing on a range of works that extend from gendered historical analyses of colonialism to critical histories of development, and based on archival research in Alabama, Arkansas, and Mississippi, I argue in this paper that what we now call international development—a form of hegemony different from but related to colonialism—needs to be understood not only as a geopolitical tool of the Cold War, but also as a technique of governance that took shape within the realm of the domestic and through a racialized gaze. I do so by tracing some of the key elements of the US international development practices in the postwar era to a different time and place: the American South, a region considered “undeveloped” in the first decades of the twentieth century, and the agricultural extension practices that targeted the rural farm home and farm women, particularly African‐American women. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-0C7ZWNST-Q National Science Foundation - No. 1262774 ArticleID:ANTI12138 istex:43E89E3B360A8146FB30CD33B49DC090FF56D619 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0066-4812 1467-8330 |
DOI: | 10.1111/anti.12138 |