Intrapericardial, But Not Extrapericardial, Fat Is an Independent Predictor of Impaired Hyperemic Coronary Perfusion in Coronary Artery Disease

OBJECTIVE—To measure intrapericardial fat (IPF), extrapericardial fat (EPF), and myocardial perfusion (MBF) in patients with and without coronary artery disease (CAD), hypothesizing that perfusion is more strongly associated with IPF because it is in direct anatomic contiguity with the myocardium or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 211 - 218
Main Authors Bucci, Marco, Joutsiniemi, Esa, Saraste, Antti, Kajander, Sami, Ukkonen, Heikki, Saraste, Markku, Pietilä, Mikko, Sipilä, Hannu T, Teräs, Mika, Mäki, Maija, Airaksinen, K.E. Juhani, Hartiala, Jaakko, Knuuti, Juhani, Iozzo, Patricia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia, PA American Heart Association, Inc 01.01.2011
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:OBJECTIVE—To measure intrapericardial fat (IPF), extrapericardial fat (EPF), and myocardial perfusion (MBF) in patients with and without coronary artery disease (CAD), hypothesizing that perfusion is more strongly associated with IPF because it is in direct anatomic contiguity with the myocardium or coronary arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS—Fat surrounding the heart may increase the risk of CAD and calcification, but little is known about the role of MBF in this relationship. The study included 107 patients with an intermediate likelihood of CAD. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography was used to measure IPF and EPF volumes and coronary artery calcium level, together with MBF at rest and during adenosine-induced hyperemia. Subsequently, all subjects underwent coronary angiography and were grouped for presence/absence of CAD and severity of myocardial hypoperfusion. IPF and EPF levels were higher in men and in patients with CAD (n=85) than in those without CAD (n=22) (P<0.001). EPF was increased regardless of the degree of stenoses (n=45), whereas IPF was selectively increased in subjects with obstructive stenoses (n=40). IPF and EPF levels were both associated with coronary artery calcium scores (R=0.25 and R=0.26, respectively; P<0.02), coronary flow reserve (R=−0.37 and R=−0.38, respectively; P<0.001), and hyperemic MBF (R=−0.36 and R=−0.44, respectively; P<0.0005). Male sex was a strong negative predictor of MBF. After discounting for confounders, myocardial hyperemic perfusion was predicted independently by sex, coronary artery calcium score, and IPF, but not EPF. CONCLUSION—CAD is accompanied by augmented fat depots surrounding the heart, which are negatively related to coronary flow hyperemia. Among fat depots, IPF was the only independent predictor of hyperemic MBF, supporting the hypothesis of a direct paracrine/vasocrine effect.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1079-5642
1524-4636
DOI:10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.213827