Phase 2 Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Patients with Primary Renal Cancer

In this clinical trial, we investigated a novel noninvasive treatment option of stereotactic radiation therapy for the treatment of primary kidney cancer. We found that stereotactic radiation was safe and effective for the treatment of primary kidney cancers. Most renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are lo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean urology Vol. 84; no. 3; pp. 275 - 286
Main Authors Hannan, Raquibul, McLaughlin, Mark F., Pop, Laurentiu M., Pedrosa, Ivan, Kapur, Payal, Garant, Aurelie, Ahn, Chul, Christie, Alana, Zhu, James, Wang, Tao, Robles, Liliana, Durakoglugil, Deniz, Woldu, Solomon, Margulis, Vitaly, Gahan, Jeffrey, Brugarolas, James, Timmerman, Robert, Cadeddu, Jeffrey
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Elsevier B.V 01.09.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this clinical trial, we investigated a novel noninvasive treatment option of stereotactic radiation therapy for the treatment of primary kidney cancer. We found that stereotactic radiation was safe and effective for the treatment of primary kidney cancers. Most renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are localized and managed by active surveillance, surgery, or minimally invasive techniques. Stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) may provide an innovative non-invasive alternative although prospective data are limited. To investigate whether SAbR is effective in the management of primary RCCs. Patients with biopsy-confirmed radiographically enlarging primary RCC (≤5 cm) were enrolled. SAbR was delivered in either three (12 Gy) or five (8 Gy) fractions. The primary endpoint was local control (LC) defined as a reduction in tumor growth rate (compared with a benchmark of 4 mm/yr on active surveillance) and pathologic evidence of tumor response at 1 yr. Secondary endpoints included LC by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), safety, and preservation of kidney function. Exploratory tumor cell–enriched spatial protein and gene expression analysis were conducted on pre- and post-treatment biopsy samples. Target accrual was reached with the enrollment of 16 ethnically diverse patients. Radiographic LC at 1 yr was observed in 94% of patients (15/16; 95% confidence interval: 70, 100), and this was accompanied by pathologic evidence of tumor response (hyalinization, necrosis, and reduced tumor cellularity) in all patients. By RECIST, 100% of the sites remained without progression at 1 yr. The median pretreatment growth rate was 0.8 cm/yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.3, 1.4), and the median post-treatment growth rate was 0.0 cm/yr (IQR: –0.4, 0.1, p < 0.002). Tumor cell viability decreased from 4.6% to 0.7% at 1 yr (p = 0.004). With a median follow-up of 36 mo for censored patients, the disease control rate was 94%. SAbR was well tolerated with no grade ≥2 (acute or late) toxicities. The average glomerular filtration rate declined from a baseline of 65.6 to 55.4 ml/min at 1 yr (p = 0.003). Spatial protein and gene expression analyses were consistent with the induction of cellular senescence by radiation. This clinical trial adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that SAbR is effective for primary RCC supporting its evaluation in comparative phase 3 clinical trials. In this clinical trial, we investigated a noninvasive treatment option of stereotactic radiation therapy for the treatment of primary kidney cancer and found that it was safe and effective.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Hannan, Brugarolas, Timmerman, Pop, Pedrosa, Kapur, Garant, Ahn, Christie, Zhu, Wang, Robles, Durakoglugil, Woldu, Margulis, Gahan, Brugarolas, Timmerman, McLaughlin, Cadeddu.
Supervision: Hannan, Brugarolas, Timmerman.
Author contributions: Raquibul Hannan had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Analysis and interpretation of data: Hannan, Christie, McLaughlin, Ahn, Zhu.
Drafting of the manuscript: Hannan, McLaughlin.
Statistical analysis: Christie, Ahn.
Study concept and design: Hannan, Timmerman, Brugarolas, Cadeddu.
Other: Patient screening and enrollment: Hannan, Garant, Margulis, Gahan, Timmerman, Cadeddu, Woldu, Gahan.
Obtaining funding: Hannan.
Acquisition of data: Hannan, McLaughlin, Christie, Robles, Durakoglugil, Pop, Pedrosa, Kapur.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Timmerman.
ISSN:0302-2838
1873-7560
1873-7560
DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.016