Norfloxacin is more effective than Rifaximin in avoiding bacterial translocation in an animal model of cirrhosis
Background & Aims Norfloxacin administration is useful in preventing bacterial infections in cirrhosis but associated to the generation of resistant species. Rifaximin is known to reach high concentrations in the intestinal lumen without generating relevant resistance in the intestinal flora. Ou...
Saved in:
Published in | Liver international Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 295 - 302 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.02.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background & Aims
Norfloxacin administration is useful in preventing bacterial infections in cirrhosis but associated to the generation of resistant species. Rifaximin is known to reach high concentrations in the intestinal lumen without generating relevant resistance in the intestinal flora. Our aim was to compare the effect of Norfloxacin and Rifaximin on intestinal flora composition, bacterial translocation and survival in cirrhotic rats.
Methods
Cirrhosis was induced in rats by oral administration of CCl4. Animals were divided into three groups: only CCl4 (group I, n = 10); CCl4 + Norfloxacin (group II, n = 17) and CCl4 + Rifaximin (group III, n = 14). Gut bacterial composition, bacterial translocation and cytokine levels were measured.
Results
Forty‐one rats were finally included. The incidence of viable and non‐viable bacterial translocation was significantly reduced in animals receiving Norfloxacin; Rifaximin also decreased the incidence of viable and non‐viable bacterial translocation, but did not reach statistical significance. Serum TNF‐α levels were significantly lower in antibiotic groups. Norfloxacin modified intestinal microbiota, depleting significantly more pathobionts than Rifaximin.
Conclusion
Norfloxacin is more effective than Rifaximin in preventing bacterial translocation in rats with cirrhosis probably because of its capacity to reduce pathobionts from intestinal microbiota. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information This investigation was supported with a grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (PI12/0020, PI16/0967), Generalitat Valenciana, Spain (PROMETEO/2016/001), and FEDER funds (EU). ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1478-3223 1478-3231 |
DOI: | 10.1111/liv.13551 |