Making the case for democratic assessment practices within a critical pedagogy of physical education teacher education

There has been growing interest in alternative assessment strategies that focus on student participation within higher education over the past 20 years. At the same time, it is important to note that there is very little published research dealing with alternative forms of assessment in the field of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean physical education review Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 104 - 119
Main Authors Lorente-Catalán, Eloísa, Kirk, David
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.02.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There has been growing interest in alternative assessment strategies that focus on student participation within higher education over the past 20 years. At the same time, it is important to note that there is very little published research dealing with alternative forms of assessment in the field of physical education teacher education (PETE). In this paper we seek to make a case for democratic assessment practices within a critical pedagogy of PETE. We begin by outlining developments in assessment in higher education in general, before considering student participation in assessment processes. We then consider some strategies of participative assessment, and discuss their benefits, risks and difficulties. An account of the experience of the National Network of Formative and Shared Assessment in Higher Education in Spain provides us with a working example of the implementation of democratic practices in assessment in PETE. We conclude that the lack of research in physical education on democratic assessment practices raises serious questions about the extent to which our field is committed to producing teachers capable of meeting the complex social and cultural challenges they will surely meet in the schools of tomorrow.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1356-336X
1741-2749
DOI:10.1177/1356336X13496004