U.S. Audit partner identification and auditor reporting

• Published in: Journal of accounting and public policy Vol. 41; no. 1; p. 106862
• Main Authors: Abbott, Lawrence J., Boland, Colleen, Buslepp, William, McCarthy, Sean
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Elsevier Inc 01.01.2022; Elsevier Sequoia S.A
• Subjects: Auditors reports; Audits; Bankruptcy; Capital markets; Companies; Disclosure; Financial institutions; Going concerns; Money; Partners; United States > US; M48; M42
• ISSN: 0278-4254; 1873-2070
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106862

After a lengthy and protracted debate, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) adopted new rules requiring disclosure of the engagement partner’s name and information about other accounting firms on the new PCAOB Form AP, Auditor Reporting of Certain Audit Participants. We investigate the impact of this regulation on auditor behavior in the context of the auditor’s going concern report modification propensity. We document an increase in the propensity to issue a going concern report modification in the disclosure regime, accompanied by a corresponding increase in the Type I (‘false positives’) error rate. Thus, an unintended consequence of Rule 3211 is the potential reduction in the audit report's informativeness. Conceivably, a more significant repercussion is that going concern modifications can hasten bankruptcy for firms since financial institutions may be reluctant to lend money to firms with modified audit reports. An unjustified increase in the going concern modification rate as evinced in our paper may make U.S. capital markets potentially less attractive to young, upstart, albeit financially-distressed, companies.